Global Business Ventures: Starting a US Company as a Non-Citizen

However, this does not imply that they lack cultural clout. This is why I believe that people without a formal education can still have great skills, knowledge, and vibes, ya know? 

 Cultural cap can be found in them but is not visible in the insta state, but it can also be acquired or transmitted within the home (Sullivan, 2001), acquired through family, or emerged through deeply held ideas, beliefs, and abilities. Sullivan's argument was completely echoed by Umut, you know? Erel stated, "...cultural capital consists also of informal education transmitted through the family, political parties, cultural groups, etc." (Erel, 2010: 643), family.

Cultural capital is a non-economic asset that you invest in, but it has its own economy, you know? It's all about the vibe, but you also have to consider the flex and clout, you know? Bourdieu also believed that the flexibility of different types of capital and the ability to switch up were important aspects of his theories. The various types of capital can be flexed for each other, but the process of switching them is not always simple or risk-free. In any case, the link between social and cultural capital allows them to flex and become even more unique. However, cultural capital is extremely useful for leveraging more social capital - i.e., the knowledge and resources you gain from your squad. Focusing on the use of social caps will undoubtedly increase research into how much they have contributed to equalizing cultural caps for migrant farm workers.However, just because you convert and transfer your capital does not guarantee that you will have easy access to another type of capital that will allow you to enter the job market. Migrants may still struggle with a lack of social clout, which can prevent them from obtaining good jobs even if they bring their cultural knowledge with them to a new country. For example, starting with migrants' networks may result in a complete failure to recognize their cultural swag and assets brought from their home country, ya know? So, if you want to understand what my research is about, you've got to be all about cultural and social capital.

Influence over others

Cultural capital emerges from social interactions (Ball et al., 2003) and flows through all aspects of social relationships.  According to Bourdieu and Passerson (1977), the concept of 'capital', whether cultural, social, or economic, is central to reproduction. OMG, having a lot of resources helps people level up and gain clout in society. Social and cultural capital are inextricably linked, you know? Let me give you an example. Educational achievement, which is boosted by cultural capital, allows a person to exercise their privileges, you know? Then they can establish a high-status culture in society, fam. Educational flexibility influences job perks, whereas social connections can help you secure the bag and level up. It's all about the clout and obtaining that privilege, fam. Gaining privilege is determined by the size and visibility of your social networks, as well as the amount of time and effort you devote to them, fam.I want to argue that displaying educational credentials as cultural clout for migrant farm workers does not always help them find work when they lack sufficient social connections. I want to know where Bourdieu's symbolic violence is, you know? It's like when someone is all dominant, but it's not because they have fancy degrees, but because of the benefits of their job. This type of symbolic violence in the form of social flexing and privilege may be subtle, but it could be done on purpose to maintain social clout. Bourdieu would say that the higher-class crib gives the higher-class student mad educational credentials because cultural capital is being instilled in that home, ya know? OMG, rich people can totally pass down their wealth while maintaining their fancy status, you know? And they all say, "I'm legit, I rule this society!"Bourdieu also understands that educational credentials aren't the only way to flex privilege; there are other options, such as inheriting mad property and gaining an occupational advantage, ya feel me? (Sullivan 2001). 

If someone doesn't gain clout from social media, their cultural capital doesn't really show when it comes to job prospects. This is so true for migrant cases, fam.

Drawing on oral history interviews with geriatricians, a medical specialty facing severe labor shortages, Raghuram et al. (2010) demonstrated how non-migrant social networks, primarily represented by white doctors, were extremely important in influencing migrant job opportunities in Britain's medical job market. According to the study, migrant doctors' placement in more lit jobs and cool specialties was primarily influenced by the strength and importance of non-migrant social connections (white consultants). The result was'migrant junior docs vibin' with their consultants' clout networks' (2010:12).

According to studies, skilled doctors from South Asia who remained loyal to their ethnic group and culture have been at a disadvantage in the medical job market since the establishment of the NHS. It's because of both migrant and non-migrant social networks, you understand? These studies do not address the impact of non-migrant networks on the equality doctrine, fam. Such networks provide tremendous support to those who are a part of them and work for them, but they also create social inequalities and frustration for those who aren't part of the crew but have the intelligence, skills, and potential to advance in their careers. According to these studies, the social and clout of migrant and non-migrant doctors is more important than cultural clout. The outcomes of those networks are, like, completely not seen as meritocratic, and thus not legitimate.